'Making A Murderer' And Steven Avery Sympathizers Did Horrible Thing To Lawyer Who Convicted Him

by Rolly Gacelo / Feb 20, 2016 11:00 PM EST

Making a Murderer season 2 officially a go

"Making a Murderer" and its attempt to tell the story of convicted murderer Steven Avery has divided the country.

Those who think the Wisconsin man was set up and others think the Netflix is being biased about the case in favor of Avery.

Some people who are on Avery's side are more progressive though to the point that they threaten people who sent him to prison. One of those on the wrong end is prosecutor Ken Kratz who was heavily featured in "Making a Murderer" series.

Many people are going after Kratz that online review site Yelp was forced to ban some of those who speak ill or threaten the lawyer.

"This business recently made waves in the news, which often means that people come to this page to post their views on the news," the company told Express UK.

"While we don't take a stand one way or the other when it comes to these news events, we do work to remove both positive and negative posts that appear to be motivated more by the news coverage itself than the reviewer's personal consumer experience with the business."

Kratz has once slammed Netflix and "Making a Murderer" for portraying him as a villain. He also blasted the way it portrayed some of the plots.

"In the Making a Murderer documentary, they include a media clip about '5 women coming forward'," he told The Mirror Online.

"They don't tell you that all of those, with the exception of the texting incident (which I self-reported) were fabrications. They never happened. Why don't they tell the viewers those were all untrue?"

"Making a Murderer" aired on December last year and has received critical acclaims. However, it also became one of the more controversial docu-series to date.

Celebrities like Ricky Gervais and Alec Baldwin praised "Making a Murderer." However, the community where Steven Avery lived and prosecuted did not like the attention the town is getting again. They think the case should have not been discussed anew for it disturbs their already peaceful community.