ADOR Swapped Its Lawyers Three Days Before Trial. Today, a Judge Decides Whether That Changes Anything.
The first formal hearing in ADOR's $31 million lawsuit against former NewJeans member Danielle is scheduled for 3:10 p.m. today at Seoul Central District Court - and ADOR's legal team is brand new.
On April 24, all five attorneys from Kim & Chang, one of South Korea's most prominent law firms, filed simultaneous resignation notices from the case. ADOR subsequently appointed four lawyers from Law Firm Rihan on May 8 and immediately submitted a motion to postpone the hearing. The court has not yet ruled on that request. Under Korean civil litigation procedure, a judge can deny a postponement if the delay appears tactical - and Danielle's legal team has been arguing exactly that since March.
The damages claim at the center of the case is 43.1 billion KRW, approximately $31 million USD. ADOR filed the lawsuit in December 2025 against Danielle, a family member, and former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin, alleging that they bear collective responsibility for NewJeans' departure from the agency and the resulting disruption to the group's activities. Min Hee-jin's own put-option dispute with HYBE - a separate case - was heard in the same Civil Division 31, presided over by Chief Judge Nam In-soo, who will also handle today's proceedings.
At the March 26 preparatory hearing, the two sides clashed openly over pacing. Danielle's representatives argued that ADOR had already requested a two-month extension at that stage, saying the plaintiff appeared to be engineering a slow-motion trial. ADOR denied any intent to delay and cited the volume and complexity of disputed issues. The court sided with neither framing, rejected ADOR's extension request, and locked in May 14 and July 2 as firm hearing dates.
The lawyer swap has sharpened that argument. Kim & Chang's resignation came 20 days after the preparatory hearing - early enough to require new counsel to review an extensive case record before today's session. Law Firm Rihan, now representing ADOR, is also currently handling Bang Si-hyuk's defense in a separate capital markets law case, adding an unusual institutional overlap to an already complicated legal picture.
For Danielle, the procedural question has real-world stakes. She has been effectively sidelined since December 2025, when ADOR terminated her exclusive contract and the $31 million suit was filed. Her legal team has argued in prior hearings that the hiatus itself functions as a penalty - that every postponed date is another month of blocked income and a frozen career. Other former NewJeans members have moved in different directions: Hanni has reportedly returned to discussions with ADOR, and Haerin and Hyein are in ongoing talks. Danielle remains the sole member still in active litigation.
If the court denies today's postponement request, ADOR's new counsel will have to argue the case with days of preparation against a legal team that has been on the case for months. If the court grants it, the next hearing moves to July 2 - adding another seven weeks to Danielle's professional limbo.
The July 2 date holds regardless of today's outcome.

